|
Our phone number is (864) 840-9472 Our Email is icfaith@ymail.com |
|
WISCONSIN Compulsory Attendance Ages: “between the ages of 6 and 18 years.” (6 by
September 1, § 118.14) West’s Wisconsin Statutes Annotated § 118.15. Required Days of Instruction: “at least 875 hours of instruction each school
year.” Wis. Stat. Ann. § 118.15(4), § 118.165(c). Required Subjects: Reading, language arts, math, social studies, science and
health. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 118.165(d). Home School Statute: Wis. Stat. Ann. § 118.15(4), § 118.165(1). 1. Definition: A “home-based private educational program” is a program of
educational instruction provided to a child by the child’s parent or guardian or
by a person designated by the parent or guardian. An instructional program
provided to more than one family is not a home-based private educational
program. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 115.001(3g). However, a home schooling parent can be
“a person designated” by another parent to do the teaching for their student. In
this case, however, the parents should still file a statement of enrollment (see
#2 below) for their own children. 2. By October 15 each year the parents must submit a statement of enrollment
to the Department of Public Instruction, indicating whether the home school
meets all the requirements under Wis. Stat. Ann. § 118.165. Wis. Stat. Ann. §
115.30(3). Parents must use the PI-1206 Home-Based Private Educational Program
Registration three-part form supplied by the Department of Public Instruction. 3. “Instruction in a home-based private educational program that meets all of
the criteria under § 118.165(1) may be substituted for attendance at public or
private school.” § 118.15(4). The § 118.165(1) criteria are: 4. This statute was the result of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision
in Wisconsin v. Popanz, 112 Wis. 2d 166, 332 N.W.2d 750 (Wis. 1983) which held
that the former law was “void for vagueness insofar as it fails to define
private school.” Popanz, 332 N.W. 2d at 756. 5. In Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), the U.S. Supreme Court stated
“...this case involves the fundamental interest of parents, as contrasted with
that of the State, to guide the religious future and education of their
children…. This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children
is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.” Yoder, at
232. The Court further emphasized “and when the interests of parenthood are
combined with a free exercise claim … more than merely a reasonable relation to
some purpose within the competency of the State is required to sustain the
validity of the State’s requirement under the 1st Amendment.” Id. at 233. The Court concluded “...the First and Fourteenth Amendments prevent the State
from compelling respondents [Amish] to cause their children to attend formal
high school….” Id. at 234. Teacher Qualifications: None. Standardized Tests: None. |
|
Copyright © 2009 I C Faith Ministries www.igotsit.com Has School of Tomorrow paces for sell Last Updated:
07/13/2010 |